Six Problem Solving Mindsets For Uncertain Times

“Great problem solvers are made, not born” tells us Charles Conn and Robert McLean in their article. They found “six mutually reinforcing approaches” making leaders great problem solvers. Using their method if do not solve each problem, definitely can achieve better outcome that we have so far!

  1. Be curious

When facing uncertainty, remember behavior of the four years old child, asking never ending “Why?” Our brain is imposing patterns what in a past represented a solution to us or other people, but the current one is a different and unique situation. As we ask questions, answers describe here and now making possible to formulate better and more creative solution to the current problem.

2. Tolerate Ambiguity

The real world is highly uncertain. The reality unfolds as the complex product of stochastic processes and human reactions. The best problem solvers can’t appear as a brilliant engineer giving targeted, precise solution to each situation. Instead we form hypotheses, translate it to data, analyze and refine it, formulate a solution, refine it, finalize it – or drop it down to pick up and try another one. This requires embracing of imperfection, accepting the ambiguity of the situation and form the solution which can be odd rather than certain.

3. Take a dragonfly eye-view

Dragonflies have large, compound eyes, with thousands of lenses and photoreceptors sensitive to different wavelengths of light.  We don’t know exact how the brain of this insects forms a picture to them, the analogy is important for us: describe situation from multiple points of view, using different tools and systems for analysis and accept the complex picture (might be contradictory in details) as the reality. This is the point from where can start searching of solution.

4. Pursue occurrent behavior

Occurrent behavior is what actually happens in a time and place, not what was potential or predicted behavior. Complex problems don’t give up their secrets easily, they do not follow a pattern or a recipe – but that shouldn’t deter problem solvers from exploring. The mindset requires to be a restless experimenter – this allows us to generate our own data, which aren’t available to competitors and gives us insights that others don’t have.

5. Tap into collective intelligence and the wisdom of the crowd

The experience shows: it’s a mistake to believe about our team that the smartest people are all in the room. They aren’t there. And it’s not a problem, if you can access their intelligence via another means. Crowdsourcing invites the best people to work with you. Conn and McLean describe an experiment where organizers were searching for an algorithm for recognizing size and specie of fishes. They offered a prize and 2293 teams were attracted to work on solution.  The result is an unique algorithm, the best on the earth!

6. Show and tell to drive action

Although usually not associated to problem solving, this mindset is critical: it connects audience with a problem, picking up their interest, than combination of logic and persuasion drives to action. Conn and McLean tells how activists brought 17 bucket of water in a meeting room when asking support for restoration of oyster reefs , declaring this amount of water is filtered by one shell in a day. Decision makers were curious what represents buckets, and need for conservation become touchable through its physical dimension – led program to be approved.

The mindset of problem solvers is just an important as the method they apply. Creative application of mindsets from above list creates new possibilities in our unpredictable world!

Charles Conn and Robert McLean (both alumnus of McKinsey’s Sydney office) are authors of article “Six problem-solving mindsets for very uncertain times” (published 15-th September 2020 by McKinsey. Complete article you found here https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/six-problem-solving-mindsets-for-very-uncertain-times#)

There are no secrets!

While offering cooperation to managers, the first reaction I recognize is a doubt. To improve productivity is really possible? Why it would happen this time on a Project (and not last week/month)? What is that what makes the Project different?  

Well, it’s hard to give a specific answer. General task is to found a principle, a habit what acts as an obstacle in material (information) flow and implement a change to alleviate its power. The obstacle (bottleneck) appears in each company in a different shape, as well the corrective action, just like in following examples: 

  1. Tiles production (Hungary)

There is a tile producer in Hungary (capacity: 6 million m2), coating what gives the smoothness and shine (glaze) is produced in small unit of it. In a moment management realized: the import glaze cost 18 EUR/kg, from own production 22, so seemed more profitable to close the unit and outsource the production.

Productivity project focused on implementation and evaluation of KPI’s and in 6 month succeed to decrease the own cost below 16 EUR/m2. Changes are possible!

2. Wood processing (Romania)

In a wood processing company dryer of veneer is a bottleneck. During project observed: conveyor loaded under nominal capacity from the fear of stack, what would result in a 20 minute of downtime.

Productivity project focusing on KPI values included maintenance team in daily evaluation, and regular maintenance made possible sheets didn’t stack anymore! This implementation led to 16% average volume increase of bottleneck position!

3. Metal air tank production, Hungary

Productivity analysis discovered bottleneck at semi-automatic turner machines. Shift (8 hours) production was 1800 pieces for long years, however machines had capacity for 2500 pieces.

During 26 weeks project implemented additional cleaning step into operation instructions, what resulted shift production to increase to 2250 piece.

4. Silicone products for mum and baby

 A well conducted company in West-Hungary faced stagnation in produced volume, despite implemented and evaluated KPI system and obviously existing room for improvement.

Productivity audit discovered GEF (GE Factor) in calculation method, what has role to correct values in case of disturbing events (down time, decreased number of operators). This method is OK, when calculating and following personal productivity, and led to mistake while used to calculate machine productivity. A simple correction made disturbances and effects visible!

5. Cluttered office, untidy production

Multinational plastic mold injection company in Romania facing long changeover times, oil spots, high scrap rate and lack of space at shop floor.

Visiting offices, discovered desk covered with descriptions, orders, spare parts, office needs 30 cm high! Manager, who can’t keep order in his office, is unable to do that in production either.

Implementation of 5S in offices and production changed situation dramatically. Room and task for improvement became visible immediately!

6. Productivity project is a teamwork led by specialist!

Productivity project at a wood processing company in Romania included direct manager trainings, where supervisors learned to give feedback upon value of daily production KPI’s.

Motivated by desire for positive evaluation they proposed a machine layout change in order to decrease transportation time. Cumulated result of changes contributed to decrease 22,18 (worked man hour per 1 m3 of product) to 16,55. 

Resume:

Above experiences tells me: there are no secrets, each outcome has its own reason and 99% of them are measurable and improvable. One important question remains to be answered: are you going to ask for better results, or you just let the status as it is?